As 2019-nCoV aka COVID-19 spreads across the world, many are talking about vaccines like they are going to be a solution.
If you’re smart, you should not be counting on a vaccine to zero out your risk from COVID-19. Vaccines have risks and limitations.
There are many other steps you can take, whether or not you believe a vaccine is a good choice, that can help reduce your risks from COVID-19.
If you are already familiar with the many problems with vaccines for RNA viruses (such as COVID-19), toxic ingredients, current vaccine manufacturing technologies, and questionable safety testing, you may choose to skip down towards the end of this article to get to suggested steps you can take now.
Flu Vaccine As A Model For COVID-19 Vaccines
Consider flu vaccines to better understand why COVID-19 vaccines may be a poor solution.
COVID-19 is a lipid enveloped RNA virus like influenza virus. The immune system has a hard time seeing the proteins inside of the innocuous looking lipid layer. As an RNA virus, it mutates more rapidly than DNA viruses making it a moving target for vaccine development.
The virus circulating in a few months is likely to be different from what is circulating now, meaning the protein targets or viral strain(s) used in a vaccine may no longer match. Thus the antibody response generated would be against a virus that is not the strain spreading at the moment.
Flu vaccines often fail to target the currently circulating strains. Even government vaccine cheerleaders such as the CDC admit they are poorly effective if they do not include the strains that actually end up circulating during the flu season.
Even in a single infected person, an RNA virus may mutate fast enough that the strain replicating at the moment in the body significantly differs from the initial strain that established the infection.
Such observations may help explain the reports that some who recovered and tested negative for COVID-19 days go on to test positive for the infection at a later date.
You might think that being injected with the flu vaccine, even if it is ineffective, will not hurt you. But scientific research and medical opinion suggests that could be very wrong, for multiple reasons.
Flu Vaccine May Raise Risk for COVID-19
There are scientific papers showing the use of the flu vaccine increases the overall number of respiratory infections versus not using it. For example, see Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine and Study: Getting flu shot 2 years in a row may lower protection.
Since COVID-19 is a respiratory illness, people who have received flu vaccines might be at increased risk. Nobody knows for sure since it is a new virus. The aforementioned studies were done years before COVID-19 was discovered. But it is at least plausible given the research on flu vaccines.
Dr. David Brownstein, MD, even thinks it is likely flu vaccines will increase the risk for COVID-19 infections:
Quote from How to Prevent Corona Virus? Avoid the Flu Shot:
The writer states, “Infectious disease specialists strongly recommend flu vaccination. And the best protection for older people against bacterial pneumonia is, paradoxically, to vaccinate children…”
Folks, this is another example of FAKE NEWS! The flu vaccine has never been shown to protect against pneumonia.
I would suggest the opposite is true; those who get the flu vaccine will be more at risk for other non-flu-like infections such as coronavirus. (1) This idea that the flu vaccine disrupts the immune system’s ability to fight infections is nothing new. In fact, it was first described in 1960 in relation to the flu vaccine.
I wonder if the flu vaccine was mandated in China before the coronavirus epidemic began. That could explain why so many Chinese were infected with coronavirus.
It is important to keep in mind that the flu vaccine regularly fails most (usually over 90%) who receive it. Not only does it NOT protect you against the flu, it gives the immune system problems identifying other strains of the flu as well as different non-flu like viruses such as…coronavirus.
Francis Boyle Views COVID-19 Vaccines As “More Dangerous Than Worthless”
Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, is the creator of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that was passed unanimously by Congress and signed by President George H.W. Bush. About 15 minutes 30 seconds into the interview below, they get into the vaccine topic.
Boyle believes that the weight of the evidence is that COVID-19 is an engineered virus.
He views forthcoming COVID-19 vaccines as “more dangerous than worthless”. As a relevant example, he discusses what happened with experimental Ebola vaccines, their ties to US bioweapons programs, and experimentation on Africans with live Ebola virus vaccines.
The interview dives into the history of bioweapons, how the Axis powers in World War II used China as a bioweapons testing lab, and the US takeover of Nazi bioweapons programs at the end of the war.
Boyle believes that China obtained the virus used as a basis for COVID-19 from the University of North Carolina, where he contends it was developed illegally in violation of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. The Wuhan Institute of Virology was likely working on weaponizing it, and it may have been accidentally released in Wuhan because of safety protocol lapses.
“Safe” Flu Vaccines Have Adverse Effects
The public is lead to believe that flu vaccines are very safe as you can get one in your local grocery or drug store or in many places even a Costco, dentist office, or school. But they are far from risk-free.
Flu vaccines can cause Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a paralyzing auto-immune condition that can last months or more. It even kills some. But it is a relatively uncommon adverse effect, estimated around 1 or 2 in a million uses. But if it happens to you or a loved one, it will not seem like a minor risk.
Research has found that the use of the pH1N1 flu vaccine on pregnant women is associated with spontaneous abortion within 28 days after injection (overall 2.0 times as likely) and that the rate of those spontaneous abortions goes up further (7.7 times as likely) if the woman was given the flu vaccine in both the current and previous flu seasons.
So that is another more likely way flu vaccine is associated with human deaths, and twice or 7.7 times as likely to die sounds a lot more serious than 1 or 2 in a million.
If the increase in outright death is so high in developing fetuses, what might be happening to the ones that do not spontaneously abort?
There are many other known flu vaccine adverse effects discussed in this article if you want more details.
The point here is that even a widely used vaccine can have dangerous and deadly effects, yet much of the public and even many doctors are unaware of the risks.
So how will a new vaccine for COVID-19 rushed to market compare? If anything, it seems the panic and rush will make it less likely to be adequately tested and more likely to cause adverse effects.
SARS Coronavirus Vaccine Experiments
China attempted to develop a SARS coronavirus vaccine for many years. But using such a vaccine may be more dangerous than going unvaccinated, as shown by animal tests.
When exposed to the virus, vaccinated animals developed severe illness. Their illness can be worse than in the unvaccinated because of inflammatory cytokine storms and pneumonia triggered by their immune systems having been hypersensitized by the vaccine.
Some of the scientific papers discuss this in more detail:
- Prior immunization with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) nucleocapsid protein causes severe pneumonia in mice infected with SARS-CoV
- A Double-Inactivated Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Vaccine Provides Incomplete Protection in Mice and Induces Increased Eosinophilic Proinflammatory Pulmonary Response upon Challenge
- Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus
The SARS vaccine is not the first to be abandoned due to its lethality. A century ago, attempts to develop a vaccine against scarlet fever killed nurses on whom the vaccine was tested. Today, there is still no scarlet fever vaccine. Instead, antibiotics are used to treat such infections. Perhaps that’s a hint that the focus on viral vaccines should be shifted to anti-viral treatments?
Imagine a COVID-19 vaccine is rushed into production before proper long-term testing and it has the problems of the SARS vaccine attempts.
In such a scenario, it is clearly possible that people’s immune systems could be hypersensitized and the next time they run into a similar virus, they drop dead at a higher rate than those who avoided the vaccine.
Pharma and its government servants will count those as virus deaths, thus serving to scare more people into profitably vaccinating with a vaccine that puts them at higher risk for death.
Those unfamiliar with vaccine legislation may object that companies would not do that because they would be sued for the deaths. Wrong!
In 1986, the US government passed the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act that holds vaccine companies immune from liability for CDC recommended vaccines. Whether those vaccines injure or kill 1 person or 1 million, you cannot sue the vaccine company for the harm caused if the vaccine was recommended or required by CDC.
Instead, the family of the injured has to sue the US government for damages in a kangaroo court system that puts many restrictions on due process (such as limiting discovery via blocking or hindering subpoenas, requiring injuries to persist for 6 months or more, and timeframes for filing suits that often expire before families even discover that a vaccine caused the injury or death or that there is a way to file a suit over it) that prevent many from obtaining compensation despite how it is deserved.
Even so, that program has paid out over $4 billion to date for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.
When you consider how few doctors know about VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems) and NVICP (National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) and how FDA’s former leader Dr. David Kessler testified that only about 1% to 10% of adverse drug effects are reported to the FDA, it would be reasonable to estimate the actual financial damages could be more like hundreds of billions of dollars.
Since companies bear none of this expense, vaccine makers have no incentive to improve the safety of their products.
If you’re interested, there are many more details on such legal and financial issues around vaccines in the book Vaccine Epidemic: How Corporate Greed, Biased Science, and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health, and Our Children.
China’s December 1, 2019 Vaccine Mandate
The US Library of Congress summarizes 2019 laws in China that force vaccinations on its population:
According to the Law, China is to implement a state immunization program, and residents living within the territory of China are legally obligated to be vaccinated with immunization program vaccines, which are provided by the government free of charge. Local governments and parents or other guardians of children must ensure that children be vaccinated with the immunization program vaccines (art. 6).
The Law establishes a compensation system for abnormal reactions to vaccination. A recipient of an immunization program vaccine who dies or suffers significant disability or organ and tissue damage is to be paid from the vaccination funds of the provincial level government if the damage falls within the scope of abnormal reactions associated with a vaccine or cannot be prevented (art. 56).
The Law will take effect on December 1, 2019 (art. 100).
The date of the first COVID-19 case is also December 1, 2019.
Just what is in those legally mandated vaccines in China? Could there be a connection?
Vaccine Safety Testing Is Inadequate
China is not exactly known as the world’s source of high quality pure products, so you might question the manufacturing and safety testing of its vaccines.
But even in the best of times (i.e. not a pandemic panic) in nations such as the US, vaccine “safety testing” is often deceptive fake science.
For example, multiple vaccines are not tested together. How can you be sure that administering multiple vaccines in the same doctor’s visit will not cause a problem? You can’t, because there is no research done on this. Yet it is routine practice to administer multiple vaccines, such as DTaP and flu vaccine, on the same visit.
There is research done by scientists that demonstrate “synergistic toxicity” where low levels of multiple chemicals, each of which is unlikely to be lethal, when combined turn 100% lethal.
Quote from Mercury on the Mind:
Another important factor with regard to mercury on the mind, which officials at the CDC, FDA and the professors in the IOM do not consider, is synergistic toxicity — mercury’s enhanced effect when other poisons are present. A small dose of mercury that kills 1 in 100 rats and a dose of aluminum that will kill 1 in 100 rats, when combined have a striking effect: all the rats die. Doses of mercury that have a 1 percent mortality will have a 100 percent mortality rate if some aluminum is there. Vaccines contain aluminum.
Both mercury and aluminum are common in vaccines.
Aluminum is a known toxin, implicated in Alzheimer’s Disease and also known to damage the kidneys of infants and dialysis patients. But it is in many vaccines because it irritates the immune system to produce a long-term antibody response using lower quantities of expensive antigens. It is likely to be in at least some COVID-19 vaccines, also.
Mercury is less common in vaccines now than decades ago, but is still used in multi-dose vials such as are common for flu vaccines.
Both aluminum and mercury are also common in food products, in trace amounts.
After all, people are often using aluminum cookware and foil, and some of that aluminum gets into the food especially if it is acidic, such as tomato sauce. The FDA is endlessly warning people about mercury in seafood.
So how would injecting these substances nearly simultaneously into the body be safer than ingesting them through digestion where much passes through without being absorbed?
There’s an article at Children’s Health Defense Fund with far more detail on aluminum and mercury in vaccines that is well worth reading if this issue concerns you.
This looks bad to anybody paying attention. But it gets worse, much worse.
HPV Vaccine “Science”
Consider HPV vaccines.
For broad coverage of the many problems with HPV vaccines, consider reading The HPV Vaccine On Trial: Seeking Justice For A Generation Betrayed.
Here, we’ll focus on the problematic nature of HPV vaccine safety studies.
The controlled placebo arms of HPV vaccine trials largely consisted of injections of solutions that included the aluminum adjuvant used in the vaccine, not a saline solution as a proper placebo should be. As a result, if the solution used caused health problems similar to the full vaccine, statistically they would appear similar. This is then cited as evidence the vaccine is safe.
This article by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. provides many more details on the shockingly poor quality of the safety testing:
Of the 16 HPV vaccine randomized trials, only two used an inert saline placebo. Ten of the sixteen compared the HPV vaccine against a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant, and four trials used an already-approved aluminum-containing vaccine as the comparison. One does not have to be a scientist to understand that using aluminum-containing placebos is likely to muddy the comparison between the treatment and control groups. Critics of the HPV vaccine have pointed to the aluminum adjuvant as the most likely cause of adverse reactions, and some researchers have questioned the safety of using aluminum adjuvants in vaccines at all, due to their probable role as a contributor to chronic illness. The aluminum-containing placebos appeared to provoke numerous adverse reactions among the presumably unwitting patients who received them, allowing the pharma researchers to mask the cascade of similar adverse reactions among the groups that received the vaccines. Although both placebo and study groups suffered numerous adverse events in these studies, there were minimal differences between the two groups. The similar adverse outcomes in both groups allowed industry researchers and government regulators to claim that the vaccines were perfectly safe, despite manifold disturbing reactions.
Consider the math: According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), an estimated 2.4 women per 100,000 die of cervical cancer in the US each year. On the other hand, the FDA’s Table 2 (above) shows that 2.3 per 100 girls and women developed an “incident condition potentially indicative of a systemic autoimmune disorder” after enrolling in the Gardasil clinical trial. It is difficult to understand how any rational regulator could allow more than two in 100 girls to run the risk of acquiring a lifelong autoimmune disorder, particularly when Pap smears are already doing an effective job of identifying cervical abnormalities. The NIH notes that the incidence and death rates for cervical cancer in the US declined by more than 60% after introducing Pap smear screening.
Kennedy’s article goes on to show that the harm done to the patients injected with these HPV vaccines exceeds the benefit.
How is a vaccine that causes more harm than benefit to patients considered “safe”? Perhaps since they are CDC recommended vaccines they cannot be sued for injuries and death they cause, so it is “safe” for the financial bottom line.
Using similar “scientific” techniques to “HPV vaccine science”, you could produce evidence that injecting people with a gasoline based vaccine is safe, as injecting people with virus in gasoline is likely to have similar statistical outcome to injecting them with gasoline alone.
Obviously it is not safe, yet this is the sort of fake science that passes for vaccine safety testing in the US and many of its allied nations.
Just imagine how bad it could be in countries that already have a reputation for shoddy product quality and safety!
Rushed Vaccines More Dangerous
During the 2009 flu season, vaccines were rushed to market to address what the WHO claimed was a H1N1 pandemic.
In Europe, the GSK Pandemrix vaccine was administered widely. It has been blamed for causing over 1000 cases of narcolepsy, an “incurable” (by mainstream medical standards) auto-immune disorder affecting sleep and often muscle control. The phrase “Rolling On The Floor Laughing” (ROFL) literally describes one of the narcolepsy common symptom sets known as cataplexy in which extreme emotions such as laughter or surprise can cause sudden paralysis and falling to the floor.
Flu vaccines are much more conventional than a coronavirus vaccine, so if one of them can be flawed enough to trigger auto-immune diseases then a brand new COVID-19 vaccine could be even riskier.
Government Employees Know Vaccines Can Be Risky
The anthrax vaccine is so commonly associated with adverse health effects that US military members have transferred units or left the military to avoid the vaccines.
In the aftermath of the 2014 CDC screw-up releasing anthrax from one of its labs in Atlanta, many CDC employees declined the anthrax vaccine. They may realize the risk of harm from the vaccine exceeds the risk of harm from the disease.
As many as 86 Atlanta-based workers for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may have been unintentionally exposed to anthrax, the agency says. This includes people who have come forward since the announcement Thursday, saying they were in the area during the time of exposure.
As of Thursday afternoon, the agency’s Occupational Health Clinic had seen 54 employees identified to have been in the labs or hallways at the time of exposure, according to CDC spokesman Tom Skinner.
Of the 54 who have already been seen, Skinner said only two chose not to take oral antibiotic treatment. In addition to taking antibiotics to ward off any possible anthrax infection, the CDC says 27 staffers have received the anthrax vaccine.
Vaccine Manufacturing Flaws
There are many problems with vaccine technology that the public should understand mean vaccines may harm health.
Poor quality control can lead to pathogens getting into the vaccines. For example, there have been instances of pathogens such as Serratia bacteria surviving in vaccines even though they were preserved with mercury-containing thimerosal.
Simply using mercury as a vaccine preservative has serious risks, too, even if no pathogenic bacteria are present. Thimerosal is a form of mercury preservative used in many multi-dose vaccine vials. Since it does not dissolve well, patients who get later doses from such multi-dose vials are likely to get higher doses of mercury which are more likely to cause damage to health.
There is significant evidence suggesting mercury in vaccines is connected to neurological and immune system dysfunction. Such evidence, along with documentation of the government and industry effort to cover up the danger of thimerosal in vaccines, is presented in the investigative journalism book Evidence of Harm.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has written another highly rated book on this topic, Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak.
Then there are risks with using live viruses in vaccines. Live virus vaccines infect the patient with a virus, which is supposed to be a weakened version, yet may cause them to develop usual symptoms of the disease including shedding the virus into the environment and infecting others.
If that happens to some using a correctly weakened live virus vaccine, what might happen if the process for weakening the virus didn’t work well in a certain manufacturing batch? Could a vaccine trigger disease outbreaks all on its own? It certainly appears possible.
Vaccines May Include Many Viruses, Some Pathogenic
Common vaccine manufacturing techniques involve growing viruses on cell lines, eggs, or animal organs. Yet viruses are so prevalent, it is essentially impossible to ensure these growth systems are free of viruses other than those that are intended be in the vaccine.
Viruses such as SV40 (a monkey cancer virus) and XMRV (a mouse leukemia virus) are known to have been in vaccines and biologics that use similar manufacturing technologies.
Polio vaccines for decades were contaminated with SV40 monkey cancer virus. The scientific paper Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine says polio vaccine directly exposed 98 million Americans with SV40 and may have increased US cancer rates.
The US FDA itself admits to problems with viruses in cell lines used to make vaccines. As of this 2018 paper, they still were working on the problem of virus detection in cell lines used for vaccine manufacturing:
Virus-based vaccines are made in living cells (cell substrates). Some manufacturers are investigating the use of new cell lines to make vaccines. The continual growth of cell lines ensures that there is a consistent supply of the same cells that can yield high quantities of the vaccine.
In some cases the cell lines that are used might be tumorigenic, that is, they form tumors when injected into rodents. Some of these tumor-forming cell lines may contain cancer-causing viruses that are not actively reproducing. Such viruses are hard to detect using standard methods. These latent, or “quiet,” viruses pose a potential threat, since they might become active under vaccine manufacturing conditions. Therefore, to ensure the safety of vaccines, our laboratory is investigating ways to activate latent viruses in cell lines and to detect the activated viruses, as well as other unknown viruses, using new technologies. We will then adapt our findings to detect viruses in the same types of cell substrates that are used to produce vaccines. We are also trying to identify specific biological processes that reflect virus activity.
We are also evaluating the risk of retrovirus infections in humans. (Retroviruses are RNA viruses that use an enzyme called reverse transcriptase (RT) to replicate; RNA is the de-coded form of DNA). Simian foamy virus (SFV) can be transmitted from nonhuman primates (e.g., monkeys) to humans. Although there is no evidence that SFV causes disease, the virus can remain in a lifelong quiet state in the DNA after infection. Moreover, two individuals in Africa were recently found to be infected with both HIV-1 and SFV. Therefore, it is important to determine if SFV poses a threat to human health and to understand how the virus spreads in order to create strategies for controlling human infections. Such work will also help FDA to develop a new policy regarding blood donation by individuals working with nonhuman primates and implementing formal safety guidelines for people working with SFV-infected animals. We are also investigating the consequences of dual SFV and HIV-1 infection in the monkey model.
In plain English, FDA and vaccine manufacturers cannot ensure the absence of pathogenic viruses from vaccines grown on cell lines. Some of those hidden viruses in cell lines are pathogenic and may cause tumors, cancer, or disease. Others such as retroviruses may modify your DNA with unknown results.
This is not exactly confidence inspiring, even if you believe no nefarious agendas are at work.
Given how difficult this problem is and how it has been a known problem area for many decades, best case it is likely to take many years to solve.
However, in this era of greedy unethical mega-corporations controlling even governments for their own profit and power, there are agendas that place profits over people’s health. You can see this is so many industries from tobacco to herbicides. Why would pharmaceuticals be different?
Injecting people with such intrinsically flawed vaccines essentially guarantees a revenue stream for the pharmaceutical companies that make the vaccines by creating profitable diseases such as cancer. Cancer treatment is already far beyond a $100 billion industry of its own, and the Big Pharma players in vaccines often are running cancer treatment businesses, too. Since there is no liability to the pharmaceutical companies for causing these diseases with their flawed vaccines, it is an amazingly lucrative business model to have people pay you for a medicine that will make them sick, often because it is forced on them by captive government’s gunpoint marketing efforts (i.e., you cannot go to school or have a job unless you are injected with many vaccines), so they will buy your other medicines that could be even more profitable.
Other Vaccine Safety Questions
To even scrape the surface of the many problems there are with vaccines would take the typical educated person days of reading, assuming they could even find the information in the first place. With Internet companies in social media and search engine spaces widely engaging in censorship to protect the financial interests of themselves and their customers (e.g. Pharma company advertisers), it is getting harder to find relevant information.
For starters, you might try reading some of the many excellent articles at Children’s Health Defense Fund (associated with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.) such as:
- 10 Facts Every Parent Needs to Know About Vaccinations
- Flu Vaccines: What are the Facts?
- Vaccines Containing Animal, Plant, Fungal Proteins Cause Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer
- Aluminum and Mercury Synergy: A “Perfect Storm”
- The Science is NOT Settled!
There is a large PDF document you can download for free that summarizes over 1200 studies showing problems with vaccine safety and effectiveness, including connections with diseases that may be triggered or worsened by vaccines.
It may someday be possible to make truly safe and effective vaccines, but that is not what is being fraudulently pushed on the public today.
Every current vaccine has risks and limitations. COVID-19 vaccines are going to be no better, and given the panic and rush are likely to be worse than the usual already questionable quality.
Hygiene Trumps Vaccines
A full treatment of the risks of vaccines would take at least thousands of page of writing, far beyond what this article can cover. Beyond the aforementioned books covering the dangers of mercury in vaccines, another excellent book covering vaccines, disease statistics, and questions of safety and effectiveness is Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History.
Among its many gems of information, the book uses publicly available government statistics to show graphically how the public has been fooled into believing that vaccines dramatically lowered disease infection and mortality rates. On the contrary, many of the diseases people are commonly vaccinated against had declined in prevalence and lethality to a fraction of their former rates well before vaccines against them were available. In other cases, diseases for which there are still no vaccines also have had dramatic reductions in infection and mortality rates.
How was that done? While the vaccine industry would be pleased for you to believe time-travelers transported their vaccines back into the past to produce such miracles, the authors make a very good case that it mostly had to do with basic improvements such as plumbing for clean potable water, sewer systems in cities, basic health practices such as handwashing, and improved nutrition.
In the case of COVID-19, handwashing is a real issue as the virus can spread via respiratory droplets, urine, and feces and many things that such virus contaminated substances could directly or indirectly contact such as faucets, door handles, food, and drink.
An international study investigating hygiene standards found that only 23% of mainland Chinese wash their hands using soap after using the toilet, the lowest of any nation. For comparison, the most diligent at washing hands are those in Saudi Arabia (97%). The US is somewhere in between, at 77%.
Such abject failure to practice basic hygiene is going to spread diseases that are transmissible via urine and feces. As of this writing, China has by far the most reported infections, the US has some, and Saudi Arabia has none. So the official data matches up well with basic hygiene practices. Of course there are likely to be many other factors at work, also, but do not underestimate how important this one factor may be.
As added bonuses, washing your hands with soap is inexpensive, more convenient than a trip to a doctor’s office, and unlikely to have serious side effects such as auto-immune reactions, paralysis, or death.
Immune Boosting Options
If you want to lower mortality from COVID-19 there are many other steps you can take that would also help against other diseases without the risks of vaccines. These are not even exotic or expensive. Some of them are essentially free of financial cost.
For starters, eat well. More specifically:
- Lower carbohydrate intake because sugar (including glucose from complex carbs) can suppress the immune system for hours
- Avoid gluten as it raises zonulin hormone which punches holes in tight junctions as intestinal and blood-brain barriers and those holes get let viruses and other pathogens in
- Eat foods high in phytonutrients as many plant foods (e.g. olives and olive oil, garlic, licorice root tea, elderberries, oregano and many other spices) include antivirals
Get plenty of sleep so your immune system can recharge.
Don’t smoke, and avoid polluted air as they cause oxidative damage to the lungs similar to biochemical processes that makes pneumonia so dangerous.
Supplement daily with essential nutrients such as these:
- Vitamin D3 if you cannot get adequate sun exposure
- Vitamin K2 so calcium (which vitamin D3 helps absorb) goes to your bones instead of your heart and arteries and other places it does not belong. This will also help with your dental health, too, as K2 is needed to remineralize teeth to avoid cavities.
- Vitamin A is important for antiviral activity. For example, the risk of measles complications is high in people with low vitamin A levels and can be reduced by giving them vitamin A.
- Vitamin C is essential to the immune system to let cells such as macrophages use oxidative attacks against pathogens. Consider taking a gram at a time a few times per day when you are not sick and a lot more when you are sick. Look into Dr. Thomas Levy’s work on vitamin C therapy for infections.
- Include plenty of iodine in your intake, whether from seafood such as kelp or from iodine supplements. Iodine is important for immune system function.
- Eat selenium-rich foods such as Brazil nuts or supplement with selenium. Selenium is a key nutrient to help make glutathione which protects against oxidative damage, and it has been suggested that China’s selenium-depleted soils may be a factor in high COVID-19 mortality. This is especially important if you live in an area with selenium-deficient soils such as the Pacific Northwest and Great Lakes regions of the US.
Oxidative damage from pneumonia and immune system dysfunction during infections, such as sepsis, is a major factor in many COVID-19 deaths. Smoking and air pollution are major sources of oxidative damage to the lungs, so avoid them.
Smoking also raises levels of ACE2 receptors in lung cells that the COVID-19 virus uses to infect cells, and is suspected as a major factor for why SARS and COVID-19 have been so severe in areas of Asia with high smoking rates.
It turns out that wireless technologies also worsen oxidative damage in humans.
Martin Pall’s research shows that wireless device RF from it even at levels one seven millionth US safety standards causes oxidative storms triggered by VGCC calcium influx leading to skyrocketing peroxytrite (a highly damaging free radical) in cells throughout the body. Paul Marik’s papers on using HAT (hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid / Vitamin C, thiamine / vitamin B1) Therapy to vastly lower sepsis deaths mention that a big part of the damage sepsis does is by the same oxidative damage pathways involving the same sorts of peroxynitrite storms that wireless RF triggers.
So turn off wireless devices such as WiFi, cell phones, cordless phones, baby monitors, Bluetooth, etc. while you are not using them, especially while you are sleeping.
Environmental Factors May Be Critical
Putting all of the above together might in part explain why so many are dead in Wuhan and across China:
- People in China do not wash their hands well enough or often enough
- Men in China smoke a lot
- Air pollution in Chinese cities is horrible
- Chinese telecom companies just turned on huge numbers of 5G cell sites in the past few months
- China as of December 1, 2019, mandated many vaccines on its population
Whether or not you decide to “believe in vaccines” as a solution to COVID-19, you can use the above information to protect your family and yourself.
You have substantial control over all of these things in your home and for yourself, and you can address them now.
Make washing your hands well a habit, particularly after being out in public areas or around anybody who has been ill.
Don’t live in a polluted city, or if you must, use air filters or similar devices to help keep the air in your home cleaner.
Get plenty of sleep.
Reduce your use of wireless technologies. Choose wired networks and peripherals (mice, printers, etc.) over wireless.
Eat well, and supplement nutrients that are difficult to obtain in sufficient quantities in food.
More Articles Discussing 2019-nCoV / COVID-19 Coronavirus
- Health-boosting Drinks For Coronavirus Crisis
- Is Online Shopping Safer In the COVID-19 Coronavirus Era? Will Your Amazon Package Kill You?
- Congressional Representative Takano's Office Mixes Facts With Anti-scientific COVID-19 Coronavirus Propaganda
- Do Not Rely On COVID-19 Coronavirus Vaccines, Protective Steps You Can Take Even Now
- 2019-nCoV China Coronavirus May Be Genetically Engineered For Bioweapon Or Vaccine
- 2019-nCoV Coronavirus May Spread Via Virus-Contaminated Surfaces
- Hidden Factors Behind High 2019-nCoV Rates of Transmissability and Mortality and What You Can Do About Them
- Could Coronavirus Spread Through US Sewage, Waterways, and Food Supply?
- Is There Cover-Up of China Coronavirus Spread?
- Wuhan China 2019-nCoV Coronavirus: Pandemic? Herbs and Vitamins?
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. The products mentioned in this post and on this website are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. The information presented here is for educational purposes and does not constitute medical advice. Please obtain medical advice from qualified healthcare providers. Pursuant to FTC regulations, please be aware some of the links herein may be affiliate iinks. If you click on them and complete a purchase, this website may earn a commission.